










































|
|
Welcome to my Web site!
Space is littered with millions of bits of
orbiting garbage leftover from missions. The flying flotsam can delay
launches and could potentially smash into spacecraft. Now some creative
ideas are emerging for how to sweep up the junk. One idea even involves
an oversized NERF ball.
The graveyard of ghostly scraps from satellites and other craft
continues to grow. Last year, the intentional destruction of China's
Fengyun-1C weather satellite sent at least 150,000 bits of orbital
debris less than a half-inch (one centimeter) across and larger into
space, according to NASA's Orbital Debris Program.
On Feb. 20, another load of debris was scattered into space when the
U.S. Navy shot down a wayward spy satellite above the Pacific Ocean.
Some 3,000 scraps spewed into space, each no larger than a football in
size, adding to the cosmic clutter.�
The trashiest region of space lies within low Earth orbit, located at
1,243 miles (2,000 kilometers) above the Earth's surface. Space junk can
also be found to a lesser degree in geosynchronous orbit—situated higher
at 22,235 miles (35,785 km) above the Earth.
The U.S. Space Surveillance Network is tracking about 18,000 orbiting
objects of debris about two inches (five centimeters) in diameter and
larger.
The space around our planet is also polluted by millions to tens of
millions of smaller, marble-sized pieces of debris. In order to
officially catalog derelict debris, scientists involved need to identify
each object's size, the mission it's attached to and its orbit.
Because the trash zips around the planet at around 4 to 5 miles per
second (7 to 8 kilometers per second) at least in low Earth oOrbit, the
physical makeup of space debris — especially those pieces that are five
centimeters and larger — is not really important.
"It could be made out of Jell-O or foam or stainless steel. When it's
that big, it travels at orbital velocities and it hits something else,
it's going to be a bad day," said Nicholas Johnson, program manager and
chief scientist of the NASA Orbital Debris Program Office at the Johnson
Space Center in Houston, Texas.
Ideas for tidying up space range from the mundane, such as space
tethers, to the exotic, such as trash-truck-like craft. Johnson says,
however, that none of the proposals are feasible as yet.�
Trash pile-up
Rather than clogging up waterways and landfills like Earthly litter
does, space debris has the potential to bang up working spacecraft along
with their crews.
To date, there is only one recorded incident of a collision in which the
debris was large enough to track. In 1996, a French satellite called
CERISE was struck by a piece of a French rocket that had exploded 10
years earlier.
Normally, spacecraft can use information from tracking systems to dodge
and avoid these collisions with larger objects. But small pieces of
orbital debris routinely smash into and ding spacecraft, such as the
space shuttle.
"It's not a near-term operational issue," Johnson said. "But it is
something that, like any environmental problem, if you ignore it, it
will get much worse and it could get to the point where remediating the
environment is much more difficult and expensive than simply preventing
it from becoming so bad."
To make matters worse, debris eventually begets more debris. Bits of
space junk constantly collide with their neighbors, with the current
smash-ups involving small pieces hitting larger vehicles and producing
little extra debris. But that could change.
"It's a regeneration process that is going to happen," Johnson told
SPACE.com. "The only way to prevent it would be to go up there and start
removing these large derelict spacecraft and launch vehicles."
Litter bugs
Debris collisions are just a piece of the trash pie. Accidental
explosions of old rocket bodies and other vehicles are the main
contributors to debris in space. While not the primary litterbugs,
spacecraft at the end of their lives can contribute to cosmic trash.
Currently, the international space community has followed guidelines for
preventing accidental explosions as well as for end-of-life disposal.
That means removal of spacecraft from low Earth orbit within 25 years of
their launch. Craft in geosynchronous orbit nearing old age get bumped
into a higher orbit, where they won't interfere with other
geosynchronous-orbiting satellites.
Even so, last year set a new record for the amount of space debris.
"The principle reason was the Chinese anti-satellite test," Johnson
said. "That event alone far exceeded the debris generated in any other
year, ever. Unfortunately, it's very long-lived debris; it will be up
there for decades or even a century or more."
Cosmic collectors
The international space community, Johnson said, has brainstormed and
experimented in efforts to concoct a way to clean up the graveyard of
space for the past 20 years or so. "We haven't found a single concept
which is both technically feasible and economically viable," Johnson
said. "In the future if launch costs go down dramatically, which we
always hope will happen but never does, or if we come up with new
technology, the equation may change and all of a sudden a previous
concept that was not viable could become viable."
Johnson is co-author of a new report set for publication next year that
details a review of "clean-up concepts." Ideas range from the relatively
mundane to the exotic, though none "meet all the requirements for a
viable remediation technique," Johnson said.
One of his favorite ideas involves launching a giant NERF ball spanning
a mile (1.6 km) across, which would sort of field the orbiting debris.
As small particles pass through the foamy ball, they would lose energy
and fall back to Earth more quickly.
Raining on this sporty idea, however, are technical issues. "The NERF
ball itself would fall out of orbit pretty quickly, because it's so
lightweight relative to its size; and it's non-discriminatory, so it
could accidentally run into operational spacecraft and that's not a good
idea," Johnson said.
Some other ideas
Ground-based or space-based lasers could also perturb orbits and push
the junk to lower altitudes so they would fall back to Earth quicker.
(The glitch: Lasers are very expensive and limited in the number of
objects they can interact with.)
Trash-collector vehicles could rendezvous with a chunk of debris and
latch onto it before dragging it into a lower orbit, or higher orbit,
depending on its current location.
Specially-designed vehicles could rendezvous with old rocket bodies, for
instance, and attach a propulsion system or so-called drag augmentation
device onto the object. The result would quicken the debris' descent to
Earth. "That vehicle could attach that device to an old satellite and
then maneuver to another satellite and attach another device, etc.,
etc," Johnson said. (The glitch: The vehicles and operation would be
complicated and costly.)
Or, long, thin wires called tethers could help to bring down objects.
The most promising tether concept involves attaching the tether to a
spacecraft prior to launch. (The glitch: Even though tethers work on
paper, "unfortunately, we haven't had a successful demonstration yet,"
Johnson said.)
To date, most of the remediation research and experimenting has involved
only academic institutions and national space agencies.
"There is not a business base yet for doing this," Johnson said. Though
he doesn't expect truly feasible ideas for remediation, and the
associated business opportunities, in the near-term, "that doesn't mean
we're not going to keep looking and trying."
|